I am writing to you with some urgency because our partners at Adify have proposed a short-term campaign for us to run across the Forbes.com Business & Finance Blog Network.
The campaign is very unique in that it is political in nature and may potentially be objectionable to some readers. We ask that you please take the time to consider whether you’d like this advertisement to run on your site. It is up to you to decide whether you will accept this campaign.
Some details on the campaign:
The campaign advocates a “Yes” vote on California Proposition 8, which touches on some potentially sensitive issues related to familial values and marriage. Specifically, a “Yes” vote on Proposition 8 advocates a ban on gay marriage in California.
The campaign will run only in the 300×250 ad size and will feature a video similar to a political television commercial.
The campaign is Geo-targeted exclusively to the state of California.
The overall CA-only campaign CPM is $2.85 to you.
We are hoping to set this campaign live ASAP as it only runs until November 4th – election day.
To provide you with an opt-out/reject opportunity for this single campaign, Adify has rejected this campaign across our Network. It will appear in your rejected area, at which time you could choose to accept it. We’ve been assured by Adify that the ad WILL NOT automatically serve on your site.” You can preview the video for this campaign in your Adify account as well.
Please let me know if you have any questions- feel free to call my cell phone listed below.
Have a nice weekend.
I do not wish this advertisement or any like it to run on my site. I believe that all people should have equal rights under the law and any law that discriminates on the basis of gender, age, race or sexual preference is both wrong and unconstitutional. Further I find the advocacy for such a law personally abhorrent. People should not be limited in their rights simply because other people don’t like their choices. Whom a person chooses for their partner whether be it for sex or for life has no impact on others so why should those other people that are not impacted in any way have the right to make a determination about the rights of anyone else?
I personally think that Sarah Palin is an imbecile. I simply cannot imagine a country with her as its Vice President let alone its President. In fact I think this would be enormously detrimental to all Americans in so many ways it is difficult to imagine, much less quantify in any rational way. This however, is simply my opinion and I do not grudge others their own opinions even if it is different than mine. Further, I don’t strive to limit the rights of those with a different opinion their opportunity to exercise their right to choose the candidate of their preference even though this choice will have much greater bearing on me and my life than anyone’s choice about whom they marry.
Why this is even a question boggles my mind. What small minded fear-based bigoted self-righteous meddling moron would spend time, money, or waste the public’s limited attention span on something so totally inconsequential as limiting the rights of people that make different choices to choose whom they wish to lawfully engage in matrimony? Don’t we have bigger problems than a couple of men or a couple of women choosing to live in a respectful and loving relationship?
This is a modern day witch hunt. Make no mistake about it. These same do-gooder right wing Christians are the exact same morons whom a century or two ago were the ones having witch hunts and burning blacks on crosses and before that they were the ones that were holding the inquisitioner’s hearings in Spain.
Shame on Forbes for even considering this ill-intentioned campaign and shame on any blogger whom either out of misguided beliefs or worse, simply for a few dollars would choose to display any of the rhetoric this group espouses.
Oliver W Starr