TC50: Swype a company that claims to be at the leading edge of fundamentally altering the way we input data into tablet and touchscreen devices has just demonstrated their technology – an interesting new way of tracing the letters in a word without lifting your stylus or finger and the word appears along with a selection of alternate words in case you perhaps didn’t get the exact word you wanted.
What’s strange about this is the fact that another application, WordPad by a company called Shapewriter appears to have the exact same type of technology already deployed as an iPhone application.
So the question becomes who owns the intellectual property? Does one – Swype or the other – Shapewriter have the key patent claims and is the other infringing? Tough to say. What I can say is that having downloaded WordPad on my iPhone it is a pretty interesting new means of entering text and it is fairly evident that with use one could become quite proficient at entering even large amounts of text this way.
When asked if they have any competition, Swype founders at TC50 replied that their was one application which they acknowledged was very similar; Wordpad, however they said that they were confident that in a side by side comparison that WordPad wouldn’t compare favorably to Swype. More specifically they stated that they believed their algorithm was more sophisticated that it offered more functionality and better ease of use than WordPad.
Having not had the chance to try Swype yet I can’t say how it compares to WordPad. Wordpad is pretty sophisticated and I have found it to be fairly usable. My main complaint is simply that you can’t use WordPad across the entire iPhone interface and this limitation severaly limits the utility of the application. Building this functionality into the interface in general would be a much better approach and one that I’m certain would be welcomed by smartphone users everywhere.
As for the brewing controversy – I’ll be checking in with both companies to see what the real situation is and if something breaks in this regard I’ll post an update.
My bet in on ShapeWriter which under its previous name SHARK was an IBM research project with a patent filed on 1/6/2004. Then there is also SlideIT which while it does not quite look as polished and stylish has a patent filed on 6/2/2004. Swype seems a relatively new upstart in comparison.
Hi Oliver, thanks for putting me on track of ShapeWriter. I was just posting on the controversy of SlideIT and Swype on my blog (www.henricodolfing.com), when I found your blog, and you added ShapeWriter to it.
Who cares? Such fights and disputes only hurt us, the consumers. Not only it takes longer for the technology to be available, but also it makes it much more expensive.
Multiple implementations of the same idea is a good thing, let them compete with their quality, not with their lawyers.
Well,at this stage only one of them has a very convincing free download: http://dasur.co.il/Product/SlideIT/DownloadSlideIT.php
Actually, Shapewriter also has free iPhone software available as Word Pad in the iPhone App store…
Ed.
I have been using SHARK downloaded from IBM Alphaworks in 2004 (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZCGKqjTqvE).
I have upgraded mine to the newest version of ShapeWriter (SHARK) from here: http://www.shapewriter.com/download/
SHARK User
Pingback: Want to See the Future of Mobile Device Text Input? Check out ShapeWriter | GTD Times
Pingback: Tweets that mention Controversy at TC50, Who Owns the Technology IP: Swype or Shapewriter? | StarrTrek -- Topsy.com